Table of Contents
Abstract
The Dominance and Prestige Questionnaire (DPQ; Körner, Heydasch, & Schütz, 2023) is an inventory/questionnaire designed to measure an individual’s self-perceived status related to inducing fear, intimidation, or coercion, as well as their skills, knowledge, or expertise. The content of the DPQ was adapted from the Dominance Prestige Scales (Cheng et al., 2010) and the Self-Perceived Social Status Scale (Buttermore, 2006). This 15-item questionnaire was evaluated in German samples, specifically distance-learning university students and adult participants recruited online. The development of the DPQ involved assessing its factor structure, reliability, and validity.
Keywords
Self-Concept Facets, Dominance, Prestige
Authors
Körner, Robert; Heydasch, Timo; Schütz, Astrid
Purpose
The primary purpose of the Dominance and Prestige Questionnaire (DPQ) is to assess current self-concept facets related to dominance and prestige. These facets are considered relevant across various life domains, including family and academic settings.
Validity
Nomological and criterion validity for the DPQ were supported through investigations of its associations with 72 personality variables and 14 objective criteria.
Reliability
Internal Consistency: The reliabilities for both factors of the DPQ were found to be good. For dominance, Cronbach’s alpha was .81, and for prestige, Cronbach’s alpha was .86.
Test-Retest Reliability:
Dominance: The dominance factor demonstrated high temporal stability. Over a 2-month period, the test-retest reliability was rtt(202) = .75, p < .001. Over a 4-month period, it was rtt(112) = .72, p < .001. The stability between the second and third measurement points (t2 and t3) was even higher, with rtt(114) = .79, p < .001.
Prestige: The prestige factor also exhibited high temporal stability. Over a 2-month period, the test-retest reliability was rtt(202) = .70, p < .001. Over a 4-month period, it was rtt(112) = .64, p < .001. The stability between t2 and t3 was also high for prestige, with rtt(202) = .80, p < .001.
Factor Analysis
Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA): The EFA results indicated a two-factor structure for the DPQ, with two factors having Eigenvalues greater than 1. The MAP test, the Hull-CFI, and parallel analysis consistently suggested a two-factor solution, which aligned with the theoretical rationale. This two-factor solution explained 50.31% of the total variance.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA): The expected two-dimensional factor solution exhibited satisfactory fit indices. The results were Chi-squared(89) = 540.701, p < .001; RMSEA = .091, 90% CI [.083, .099], p < .001; CFI = .940; TLI = .929.
Instrument: Dominance and Prestige Questionnaire (DPQ)
Test Type: Original Inventory/Questionnaire
Format: Responses are recorded on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).
Language Available: German
Population Group: Human; Male; Female
Age Group: Adulthood (18 years & older)
Population Details: The samples for evaluation consisted of distance-learning university students and adult participants. The studies were conducted in Germany.
Test Methodology: The methodology involved various psychometric evaluations, including Test Validity (Criterion Validity, Nomological Validity), Test Reliability (Internal Consistency, Test-Retest Reliability), and Factor Analysis (Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Exploratory Factor Analysis).
Keywords
Self-Concept, State Trait Level Measures, Social Status, Social Dominance
Authors
Körner, Robert
Author ORCID Identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8793-0830
Affiliation: Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg
Heydasch, Timo
Affiliation: Distance University of Hagen
Schütz, Astrid
Author ORCID Identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6358-167X
Affiliation: Otto-Friedrich-University of Bamberg
Email Address: [email protected]
Correspondence Address: University of Bamberg, Department of Psychology, Markusplatz 3, Bamberg, Germany, 96047, [email protected]
Permissions & Fee and Test Year
Permissions: To obtain permissions, contact the publisher.
Commercial Use: No
Fee: No
Test Year: 2023
References
Körner, R., Heydasch, T., & Schütz, A. (2023). Dominance and prestige as self-concept facets. Journal of Personality Assessment, 105(5), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2137028
Items of the Dominance and Prestige Questionnaire (DPQ)
The Dominance and Prestige Questionnaire (DPQ) is a 15-item scale.
Factors and Subscales: The DPQ measures two distinct factors/subscales:
Dominance
Prestige
| Item | Subscale | English | German |
| 1 | P | Members of my peer group respect and admire me.* | Personen meiner Bezugsgruppe respektieren und bewundern mich. |
| 2 | P | I am held in high esteem by those I know.* | Von denjenigen, die ich kenne werde ich sehr geschätzt. |
| 3 | D | Others know it is better to let me have my way.* | Andere wissen, dass es besser ist, wenn ich meinen Willen durchsetzen kann. |
| 4 | P | My unique talents and abilities are recognized by others.* | Meine einzigartigen Talente und Fähigkeiten werden von anderen anerkannt. |
| 5 | P | I am considered an expert on some matters by others.* | Ich werde von anderen als Experte/in in einigen Angelegenheiten angesehen. |
| 6 | P | Others seek my advice on a variety of matters.* | Andere suchen meinen Rat in einer Vielzahl von Angelegenheiten. |
| 7 | D | Some people are afraid of me.* | Einige Leute haben Angst vor mir. |
| 8 | P | Others admire me for what I have achieved so far. | Andere bewundern mich für das, was ich bis jetzt erreicht habe. |
| 9 | D | Others avoid conflicts with me because they know that I will prevail anyway. | Andere vermeiden Auseinandersetzungen mit mir, da sie wissen, dass ich mich sowieso durchsetze. |
| 10 | P | Due to my previous achievements, I am a respected person. | Aufgrund meiner bisherigen Leistungen bin ich eine angesehene Person. |
| 11 | P | Others are convinced of my achievements. | Andere sind von meinen Leistungen überzeugt. |
| 12 | D | In team tasks, I assert my will without taking into account the opinions of my colleagues. | In Teamaufgaben setze ich meinen Willen durch, ohne Rücksicht auf die Meinungen meiner Kollegen zu nehmen. |
| 13 | P | In group discussions, my contributions are considered valuable. | In Gruppendiskussionen werden meine Beiträge als wertvoll angesehen. |
| 14 | D | Others do what I ask of them for fear of consequences. | Andere machen was ich von Ihnen verlange aus Angst vor Konsequenzen. |
| 15 | D | I intimidate other people. | Ich schüchtere andere Menschen ein. |
Note. Items are rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). P=Prestige; D=Dominance. Items marked with an asterisk were taken from the Dominance Prestige Scales (Cheng et al., 2010) and the Self- Perceived Social Status Scale (Buttermare, 2006).
Cite this article
Mohammed looti (2026). Dominance and Prestige Questionnaire (DPQ). PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Retrieved from https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/dominance-and-prestige-questionnaire-dpq/
Mohammed looti. "Dominance and Prestige Questionnaire (DPQ)." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 6 Apr. 2026, https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/dominance-and-prestige-questionnaire-dpq/.
Mohammed looti. "Dominance and Prestige Questionnaire (DPQ)." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 2026. https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/dominance-and-prestige-questionnaire-dpq/.
Mohammed looti (2026) 'Dominance and Prestige Questionnaire (DPQ)', PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Available at: https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/dominance-and-prestige-questionnaire-dpq/.
[1] Mohammed looti, "Dominance and Prestige Questionnaire (DPQ)," PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, vol. X, no. Y, ص Z-Z, April, 2026.
Mohammed looti. Dominance and Prestige Questionnaire (DPQ). PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. 2026;vol(issue):pages.
