International Personality Item Pool – Five Factor Model – 50 (IPIP-Big5)

Instructions:

The following pages contain phrases describing people’s behaviors. Please use the rating scale next to each phrase to describe how accurately each statement describes you.

Describe yourself as you generally are now, not as you wish to be in the future. Describe yourself as you honestly see yourself, in relation to other people you know of the same sex as you are, and roughly your same age.

Very inaccurate Moderately inaccurate Neither accurate nor

inaccurate

Moderately accurate Very accurate
  Tend to vote for conservative political candidates 5 4 3 2 1
Have frequent mood swings 1 2 3 4 5
Am not easily bothered by things 5 4 3 2 1
Suspect hidden motives in others 5 4 3 2 1
Enjoy hearing new ideas 1 2 3 4 5
Believe in the importance of art 1 2 3 4 5
Have a vivid imagination 1 2 3 4 5
Am the life of the party 1 2 3 4 5
Am skilled in handling social situations 1 2 3 4 5
I am always prepared 1 2 3 4 5
Make plans and stick to them 1 2 3 4 5
Dislike myself 1 2 3 4 5
Respect others 1 2 3 4 5
Insult people 5 4 3 2 1
Would describe my experiences as somewhat dull 5 4 3 2 1
Seldom feel blue 5 4 3 2 1
Very inaccurate Moderately inaccurate Neither accurate nor

inaccurate

Moderately accurate Very accurate
  Don’t like to draw attention to myself 5 4 3 2 1
Carry out my plans 1 2 3 4 5
Am not interested in abstract ideas 5 4 3 2 1
Have a sharp tongue 5 4 3 2 1
Make friends easily 1 2 3 4 5
Tend to vote for liberal political candidates 1 2 3 4 5
Know how to captivate people 1 2 3 4 5
Believe that others have good intentions 1 2 3 4 5
Am very pleased with myself 5 4 3 2 1
Do just enough work to get by 5 4 3 2 1
Find it difficult to get down to work 5 4 3 2 1
Carry the conversation to a higher level 1 2 3 4 5
Panic easily 1 2 3 4 5
Avoid philosophical discussions 5 4 3 2 1
Accept people as they are 1 2 3 4 5
Do not enjoy going to art museums 5 4 3 2 1
Pay attention to details 1 2 3 4 5
Keep in the background 5 4 3 2 1
Feel comfortable with myself 5 4 3 2 1
Waste my time 5 4 3 2 1
Get back at others 5 4 3 2 1
Very inaccurate Moderately inaccurate Neither accurate nor

inaccurate

Moderately accurate Very accurate
1 2 3 4 5
Don’t talk a lot 5 4 3 2 1
Am often down in the dumps 1 2 3 4 5
Shirk my duties 5 4 3 2 1
Do not like art 5 4 3 2 1
Often feel blue 1 2 3 4 5
Cut others to pieces 5 4 3 2 1
Have a good word for everyone 1 2 3 4 5
Don’t see things through 5 4 3 2 1
Feel comfortable around people 1 2 3 4 5
Make people feel at ease 1 2 3 4 5
Rarely get irritated 5 4 3 2 1
Have little to say 5 4 3 2 1

Description

The IPIP-Big5 is a 50 item self-report personality test designed to measure the Big Five personality traits, as expressed in Costa and McCrae’s (1992) revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R). This assessment is appropriate for people between the age of 16 and 81, with age and gender specific norms provided. The tendency to be compassionate and cooperative rather than suspicious and antagonistic towards others. – Conscientiousness / Intellect – The tendency to show self-discipline, act dutifully, and aim for achievement. – Emotional Stability – This is the reverse of the “neuroticism” subscale found on the NEO-PI-R. Low scores on the Emotional Stability scale indicate the tendency to experience unpleasant emotions easily, such as anger, anxiety, depression, or vulnerability. – Openness – Reflects the degree of intellectual curiosity, creativity and a preference for novelty and variety.

Validity and Reliability

The IPIP-Big5 was developed by Goldberg (1999) using the International Personality Item Pool. It has been shown to correlate highly with the corresponding NEO-PI-R domain scores, with correlations that range from .85 to .92 when corrected for unreliability (International Personality Item Pool, 2001). The IPIP-5-50 scales also outperformed the NEO-PI-R versions of the same constructs as predictors of a number of clusters of self-reported behavioral acts. Buchanan, Johnson and Goldberg (2005) evaluated the validity with 2,448 participants. Factor analysis supported the construct formation, and correlated significantly with behavioral criteria. Lamers et al (2012) conducted another validation study with a sample of 1161 Dutch participants between the ages of 18 and 88, stratified for demographic variables. Gow et al. (2005) also conducted a validation study with 906 participants in Scotland and provide gender and age related norms.

Interpretation

Results consist of five scores, one for each of the personality domains, scored from 10 to 50. Scores are also represented as percentiles for comparison to age and gender specific non-clinical sample (Gow et al. 2005). Low scores on Emotional Stability has been shown to correlate with psychopathology while higher extraversion and agreeableness is correlated with psychological well-being (Lamers et al 2012).

Developer

Goldberg, L. R. (1999a). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe, Vol. 7 (pp. 7-28).

Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press. http://ipip.ori.org/newBroadbandText.htm

Number Of Questions

50

References

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe, Vol. 7 (pp. 7-28).

Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press. http://ipip.ori.org/newBroadbandText.htm Buchanan, T., Johnson, J. A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). Implementing a five-factor personality inventory for use on the internet. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 115-127.

Gow, A. J., Whiteman, M. C., Pattie, A., & Deary, I. J. (2005). Goldberg’s ‘IPIP’Big-Five factor markers: Internal consistency and concurrent validation in Scotland. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 317-329.

Lamers, Sanne M.A. and Westerhof, Gerben J. and Kovács, Viktòria and Bohlmeijer, Ernst T. (2012) Differential relationships in the association of the Big Five personality traits with positive mental health and psychopathology. Journal of Research in Personality, 46 (5). 517 – 52

International Personality Item Pool: A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences (http://ipip.ori.org/). Internet Web Site.

Developer Reference:

Goldberg, L. R. (1999a). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe, Vol. 7 (pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press. http://ipip.ori.org/newBroadbandText.htm

x