Table of Contents

Variable:
The Student Religiosity Questionnaire (SRQ) was designed to measure general religiosity in student samples. The scale items are focused on beliefs and practices associated with the Jewish religious tradition. Factor analysis of the scale items identified two dimensions labeled by the author as (l) religious principles and (2) religious practices.
Description:
The original scale consisted of 20 items written by the author. The 20-item scale used in the first studies was modified to 18 items in later work. Responses to each question are made using a 5-point continuum, with I indicating minimal agreement and 5 showing maximal agreement.
Practical Considerations: The scale as written is useful only for research with samples from the Jewish religious tradition. It is easy to administer, requiring only instructions concerning the meaning of the continuum responses. Scale scores for the two fac tors are obtained by adding appropriate item scores.
Norms/Standardization:
The initial data set was derived from a sample of 110 white South African teacher trainees. Factor analysis of this data generated two-factors: Religious Principles and Religious Practices. Following translation into Hebrew, data was gathered from a sample of 531 Is raeli11th-grade students attending national religious comprehensive schools. Factor analysis responses from these students generated the same two-factor solution. A sample of 221 Israeli 11th-grade students from a diverse selection of schools supported the two-factor scale. Ten of the 20 items loaded significantly on the Religious Principles factor and 7 items loaded significantly on the Religious Practices factor.
Reliability:
For the South African sample of 110 respondents, an alpha reliability of .89 was reported. For the Israeli student sample of 221, the alpha coefficient was .91. The coefficients were .90 and .83, respectively, for the factors labeled Religious Principles and Religious Practices. A sample of 190 teacher trainees from Bar-Ilan University yielded a Cronbach ‘s alpha of .96 (for the 18-item scale version used in this later study).
Validity:
A panel of ten theologians judged each item. An item was included on the scale if at least 7 of the 10 judges indicated that the item had face validity for assessing general religiosity.
Student Religiosity Questionnaire
Directions: For the following activities, rate your degree of observance from 1 (minimal observance) to 5 (maximal observance).
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Sabbath observance |
I |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Inter-sex socializing |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Dietary laws-observance at home |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Dietary laws-observance out of home |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Observance of days of mourning |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Observance of fast days |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Grace before meals on Sabbath |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Sabbath termination prayers |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Tabernacles festival observance |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Giving of tithes |
Directions: For the following religious principles, rate your degree of agreement from 1 (minimal agreement) to 5 (maximal agreement).
I |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Biblical miracles |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Rabbinical authority |
I |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Reward and punishment |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Individual supervision by God |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Resurrection of the dead |
I |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Creation ex nihilo |
I |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Oral law |
I |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Messianic era |
I |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Divine law |
I |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Prophecy |
Location:
Katz, Y. (1988). The relationship between intelligence and attitudes in a bilingual society: The case of white South Africa. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 65-74.
Subsequent Research:
Francis, L. & Katz, Y. (1992). The relationship between personality and religiosity in an Israeli sample. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31, 153-12.
Katz, Y., & Schmida, M. (1992). Validation of the student religiosity questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 353-356.