Table of Contents
The Religiosity Measure was developed in an attempt to evaluate the impact of religion on the respondent's daily, secular life as well as to determine the extent of in dividual participation in ritual practices. The emphasis is on one's cognitive orientation concerning a transcendent reality. The measure is intended to be applicable to religiosity in general. No particular religious affiliation or denominational creed is assumed.
Glock's (1959) four dimensions of religiosity (ritual, consequential, ideological, and experiential) were operationalized in two-item subscales, yielding an eight-item multiple-choice instrument. Each item is scored from O (option indicating least religiosity) to 4 (option indicating greatest religiosity) with the exception of the "attendance at religious services" question. This item was categorized according to four meaningful breaks in the response distribution. The maximum score for each of the four subscales is 8 with a total possible score of 32 for the subscales combined.
Some of the items are reverse worded and can be randomly ordered to minimize any kind of obvious systematic structure. Items of an ideological nature contain the verb "believe," whereas experiential items are oriented towards "feelings." Items pertaining to ritual participation are behavioral in nature.
The instrument is easy to administer and is relatively short. The level of reading competency needed to take the instrument is a high school range reading competency.
In their original study, Rohrbaugh and Jessor initially contacted a random sample of 2,220 students stratified by sex and grade level at several junior and senior high schools in a small city located in the Rocky Mountain region. Of those, 949 provided individual and parental consent and were included in the study. The college sample was drawn from a random selection of 497 freshman stu dents on a freshman registration list from the College of Arts and Sciences at a large university in the Rocky Mountain region. Of the designated sample, 276 participated in their freshman year and formed the cohort sample that was monitored longitudinally throughout their college experience. High school females (mean = 17.2) and high school males (mean = I 5.2) scored significantly higher than their same-sex counterparts in college (college female mean = 12.7; college male mean = 12.5).
Rohrbaugh and Jessor also present mean religiosity scores for their sample partitioned on the basis of such descriptors as gender, high school versus college, length of involvement with marijuana, length of sexual involvement, and social activism status.
Cronbach coefficient alphas were over .90, indicating high internal consistency for the instrument. The measure was unidimensional and homogeneous, as indicated by an average of .55 for Homogeneity Ratios (Scott, 1960).
In terms of construct validity, fe males were consistently more religious than males and high school-age students were more religious than college age, indicating good construct validity with other consistent findings in the field. In their survey, Rohr baugh and Jessor (1975) also asked subjects to note their overall religiosity on a IO-point linear rating scale. The overall religiosity score from the present instrument correlated well with this self-rating (college males r = 0.78, college females r = 0.81, high school males r = 0.83, high school females r = 0.84). Strong internal validity was indicated by the four subscales for the four student groups having an overall average correlation matrix coefficient value of 0.69. Finally, a discriminant validity analysis indicated that this instrument assessed the personal religious orientation of the individual, and was not primarily the result of his/her identification with an external religious net work or social structure.
Religiosity Measures Questionnaire
Instructions: The following questionnaire consists of seven multiple-choice items with one fill in-the-blank item. Please answer the following questions by circling the appropriate letter for the multiple-choice items and providing the most accurate number for the fill-in-the-blank question.
- How many times have you attended religious services during the past year?
- Which of the following best describes your practice of prayer or religious meditation?
- Prayer is a regular part of my daily life.
- I usually pray in times of stress or need but rarely at any other time.
- I pray only during formal ceremonies.
- I never pray.
- When you have a serious personal problem, how often do you take religious advice or teach ing into consideration?
- Almost always
- How much influence would you say that religion has on the way that you choose to act and the way that you choose to spend your time each day?
- No influence
- A small influence
- Some influence
- A fair amount of influence
- A large influence
- Which of the following statements comes closest to your belief about God?
- I am sure that God really exists and that He is active in my life.
- Although I sometimes question His existence, I do believe in God and believe He knows of me as a person.
- I don't know if there is a personal God, but I do believe in a higher power of some kind.
- I don't know if there is a personal God or a higher power of some kind, and I don't know if I ever will.
- I don't believe in a personal God or in a higher power.
- Which one of the following statements comes closest to your belief about life after death (immortality)?
- I believe in a personal life after death, a soul existing as a specific individual spirit.
- I believe in a soul existing after death as a part of a universal spirit.
- I believe in a life after death of some kind, but I really don't know what it would be like.
- I don't know whether there is any kind of life after death, and I don't know if I will ever
- I don't believe in any kind of life after death.
- During the past year, how often have you experienced a feeling of religious reverence or devotion?
- Almost daily
- Do you agree with the following statement? "Religion gives me a great amount of comfort and security in life."
- Strongly disagree
- Strongly Agree
Rohrbaugh, J., & Jessor, R. (1975). Religiosity in youth: A personal control against deviant behavior. Journal of Personality, 43, 136-155.
Demaria, T., & Kassinove, H. (1988). Predicting guilt from irrational beliefs, religious affiliation and religiosity. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 6(4), 259-272.
Friedberg, B. A., & Friedberg, R. D. ( 1985). Locus of control and religiosity in college students. Psychological Reports, 56, 757-758.
Heintzelman, H. E. (1976). Relationship be tween religious orthodoxy and three personality variables. Psychological Reports, 38, 756-758.
Glock, C. (1959). The religious revival in Amer ica? In J. Zahn (Ed.) Religion and the face of Amer ica. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Scott, W. A. (1960). Measures of test homogeneity. Educational and Psychological Measure ments, 20, 75/-757.