Table of Contents
Description
The Information Systems Trust–Measurement Model (Müller & Hertel, 2025) explores the influence of trusting information systems in routine work events on cognitive resources, performance, and well-being. The instrument was developed for a study involving a German sample of employed users of information systems. The constructs were assessed using 37 items adapted from prior research (e.g., Cacioppo et al., 1996; de Rijk et al., 1998). The authors reported factor analysis, reliability, and validity results for these items.
Purpose
The measurement model aims to assess event-specific trust in information systems, work outcomes, and context conditions.
Validity
For convergent validity, the average variance extracted (AVE) was calculated. The AVE exceeded the recommended threshold of 0.50 for each scale, except for the need for control scale (AVE=0.47).
For discriminant validity, results indicated that all heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) values were below the recommended threshold of 0.85.
Test Methodology:
The test validity was assessed using convergent validity and discriminant validity methods.
Reliability
Internal consistency was assessed by computing Cronbach’s alpha (for scales with three items or more) or Spearman-Brown correlations (for two-item scales). The values ranged from .55 to .93.
Test Methodology:
The test reliability was assessed using internal consistency.
Factor Analysis
Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the goodness of fit of the saturated model using the standardized least square residuals (SRMR), unweighted least squares discrepancy (dULS), and geodesic discrepancy (dG). The SRMR value was 0.075, which is below the recommended threshold of 0.080 (Hu, Bentler, & Kano, 1992). Both discrepancy indicators were below their corresponding 95% quantile reference distribution, providing empirical support for the latent variables.
Test Methodology:
The factor analysis was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis.
Test Methodology
Test Methodology:
The measurement model was examined for test validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, test reliability, internal consistency, and factor analysis.
Population Details
The study population consisted of employed information system users in Germany.
Respondents: Employed Information System Users
Location: Germany
Age Group:
The age group consisted of Adulthood (18 yrs & older).
Population Group:
The population group consisted of Human, Male, and Female.
Test Type
Original
Instrument Type
Inventory/Questionnaire
Construct
Information Systems Trust; Worker Outcomes
Format
Most items are measured on 7-point Likert-scales ranging from 1 = fully disagree to 7 = fully agree.
Language Available
German
Language Present:
English
Keywords
Measurement Model; Performance; Strain; Well-Being; Trust; Need for Cognition; Forgetting; Trust Disposition; Accountability; Distraction; Need for Control; Conscientiousness; Technology Competence
Index Terms:
Human Computer Interaction; Information Systems; Job Performance; Working Conditions; Measurement Models; Human Computer Interaction Measures; Employee Well Being; Technology Acceptance; Cognitive Resources; Workplace Health and Well Being Measures
Test Year
2025
Author
Müller, Lea S.; Hertel, Guido
Author ocrid Identifier
Hertel, Guido: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7754-2786
Affiliation
Müller, Lea S.: University of Münster, Institute of Psychology
Hertel, Guido: University of Münster, Institute of Psychology
Müller, Lea S.: [email protected]
files
No file is Available
Permissions
Contact Corresponding Author
Fee
No
Commercial:
No
Correspondence Address
Müller, Lea S.: University of Münster, Institute of Psychology, Fliednerstrasse 21, Münster, Germany, 48149, [email protected]
reference’s
Müller, L. S., & Hertel, G. (2025). Trusting information systems in everyday work events—Effects on cognitive resources, performance, and well-being. Ergonomics, 68(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2023.2286910
items of the Information Systems Trust–Measurement Model
Number of items:
This measure consists of 37 items.
Factors and Subscales:
Subscales: Trust Disposition; Technology Competence; Need for Cognition; Conscientiousness; Need for Control; Trust; Accountability; Distraction; Forgetting; Well-being; Strain; Performance.
Test Items Available:
No data is Available
Test Location:
2025-63882-002, Appendix, Page 36
Cite this article
Mohammed looti (2026). the Information Systems Trust–Measurement Model. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Retrieved from https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/the-information-systems-trust-measurement-model/
Mohammed looti. "the Information Systems Trust–Measurement Model." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 4 Apr. 2026, https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/the-information-systems-trust-measurement-model/.
Mohammed looti. "the Information Systems Trust–Measurement Model." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 2026. https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/the-information-systems-trust-measurement-model/.
Mohammed looti (2026) 'the Information Systems Trust–Measurement Model', PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Available at: https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/the-information-systems-trust-measurement-model/.
[1] Mohammed looti, "the Information Systems Trust–Measurement Model," PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, vol. X, no. Y, ص Z-Z, April, 2026.
Mohammed looti. the Information Systems Trust–Measurement Model. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. 2026;vol(issue):pages.
