Sexuality Scale‌‌‌

Sexuality Scale‌‌‌

WILLIAM E. SNELL, JR.,1 Southeast Missouri State University

The Sexuality Scale (SS; Snell & Papini, 1989) is an objective, self-report instrument designed to measure of three aspects of human sexuality: sexual esteem, defined as positive regard for and confidence in the capacity to experience one’s sexuality in a satisfying and enjoyable way; sexual depression, defined as the experience of feelings of sad- ness, unhappiness, and depression regarding one’s sex life; and sexual preoccupation, defined as the tendency to think about sex to an excessive degree.

Factor analysis confirmed that the items on the SS form three conceptual clusters corresponding to the three concepts (Snell & Papini, 1989). Other results indicated that all three subscales had clearly acceptable levels of reliability. Additional findings indicated that whereas there were no gender differences on the measures of sexual esteem and sexual depression, men reported higher levels of sexual preoccupation than did women. Other evidence showed that among both women and men, sexual esteem was negatively related to sexual depression, with the relationship being quite substantial among male subjects. Also Snell and Papini (1989) found that women’s sexual esteem was positively associated with sexual preoccupation, whereas among men sexual depression was directly related to their sexual preoccupation.

Description

The SS consists of 30 items arranged in a format allowing respondents to indicate how much they agree (versus dis- agree) with that statement. A 5-point Likert scale is used, with responses for each item being scored from +2 to –2: agree (+2), slightly agree (+1), neither agree nor disagree (0), slightly disagree (–1), disagree (–2). To create subscale scores (discussed below), the items on each subscale are summed. Higher positive scores thus correspond to greater agreement with the statements, and more extreme negative scores indicate greater disagreement with the statements.

To confirm the three conceptual dimensions assumed to underlie the SS, the 30 items were subjected to a principal components factor analysis. A three-factor solution was specified and rotated to orthogonal simple structure with the varimax procedure. The first factor had an eigenvalue of 8.39 and accounted for 56% of the common variance; the first factor was characterized by the items on the sexual-es- teem subscale. All 10 sexual-esteem items loaded on this factor with coefficients ranging from .52 to .82 (average coefficient, .69). The second factor had an eigenvalue of 4.75 and accounted for 32% of the common variance. All 10 of the sexual-preoccupation items loaded substantially on this factor (i.e., greater than .41), with an average loading of .65 (range = .41 to .86). The third factor, accounting for 13% of the common variance and having an eigenvalue of 1.88, dealt with the sexual-depression items; 8 of the 10 items on this sexual-depression subscale had loadings ranging from .48 to .84; average coefficient = .67. The other two items had loadings less than .20, and thus it was decided to consider them “filler items.”

Response Mode and Timing

In most instances, people respond to the 30 items by mark- ing their answers on separate machine-scoreable answer sheets. The scale usually requires about 15–20 minutes to complete.

Scoring

After several items are reverse coded (designated with an “R”), the relevant items on each subscale are then coded so that A = –2; B = –1; C = 0; D = +1; and E = +2. Next, the items on each subscale are summed, so that higher scores correspond to greater sexual esteem, sexual depression, and sexual preoccupation. Scores on the sexual-esteem and sex- ual-preoccupation scales can range from –20 to +20; scores on the sexual-depression scale range from –16 to +16. The items on the three SS subscales are: sexual esteem (Items 1, 4, 7, 10R, 13R, 16, 19R, 22, 25R, 28R); sexual depression (Items 2, 5R, 8, 17, 20, 23R, 26, 29R); and sexual preoccupation (Items 3, 6, 9R, 12, 15, 18, 21R, 24R, 27R, 30R).

An abbreviated version of the three subscales was devel- oped by Wiederman and Allgeier (1993). The 15-item SS short-form includes the following items: sexual esteem (Items 1, 4, 16, 19R, 22); sexual depression (Items 2, 5R, 8, 17, 23R); and sexual preoccupation (Items 3, 6, 12, 15, 18).

Reliability

The internal consistency of the three subscales on the SS was determined by calculating Cronbach alpha coeffi- cients, using a sample of 296 participants (209 females and 87 males) drawn from lower division psychology courses at a small midwestern university (Snell & Papini, 1989). The average age of the women in this study was 23.5 years (SD = 5.9), with a range of 19 to 53; the males averaged 23.7 years of age (SD = 4.4), with a range of 19 to 37. The alpha coefficients were computed for each of the three subscales for women and men separately and together. Each coefficient was based on 10 item scales, except for the measure of sexual depression which consists of eight items. The alphas for the sexual-esteem scale were: .92 for women, .93 for men, and .92 for all subjects. For the sexual-depression subscale, the alpha for women was .88 and the alpha for men was .94 (combined alpha = .90). The alphas for the sexual-preoccupation scale were: .88 for women, .79 for men, and .88 for all subjects.

Snell, Fisher, and Schuh (1992) also provided additional reliability evidence for the SS: sexual esteem (alpha range = to .92), sexual depression (alpha range = .85 to .93), and sexual preoccupation (alpha range = .87 to .91). Test-retest reliability, as reported by Snell et al. (1992), was sexual esteem (range = .69 to .74), sexual depression (range = .67 to .76), and sexual preoccupation (range = .70 to .76). In brief, the three subscales had more than adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

The 15-item short-form SS, 5 items per subscale, had Cronbach alphas for men and women, respectively, of .92 and .94 for sexual esteem, .89 and .89 for sexual depression, and .96 and .92 for sexual preoccupation (Wiederman & Allgeier, 1993).

Validity

Evidence for the validity of the SS comes from a variety of sources. Snell and Papini (1989) found that among university students, women’s and men’s scores on sexual esteem and sexual depression were negatively correlated. However, for women, sexual preoccupation was positively correlated with sexual esteem. In contrast, for men, sexual preoccupation was positively correlated with sexual depression. Snell et al. (1992) provided evidence that the SS measures of sexual esteem, sexual depression, and sexual preoccupation were related in predictable ways to men’s and women’s sexual behaviors and attitudes; evidence for the discriminant validity of the SS was also documented by Snell et al. (1992). Wiederman and Allgeier (1993) indicated that men score higher than do women on both the sexual-esteem and sexual-preoccupation scales. Finally, other researchers have used the SS within a therapy treatment context (Hurlbert, White, Powell, & Apt, 1993).

Instructions: The statements listed below describe certain attitudes toward human sexuality which different people may have. As such, there are no right or wrong answers, only personal responses. For each item you will be asked to indicate how much you agree or disagree with the statement listed in that item. Use the following scale to provide your responses:

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

Agree

Slightly

Neither

Slightly

Disagree

agree

agree nor

disagree

disagree

  1. I am a good sexual partner.
  2. I am depressed about the sexual aspects of my life.
  3. I think about sex all the time.
  4. I would rate my sexual skill quite highly.
  5. I feel good about my sexuality. (R)
  6. I think about sex more than anything else.
  7. I am better at sex than most other people.
  8. I am disappointed about the quality of my sex life.
  9. I don’t daydream about sexual situations. (R)
  10. I sometimes have doubts about my sexual competence. (R)
  11. Thinking about sex makes me happy.
  12. I tend to be preoccupied with sex.
  13. I am not very confident in sexual encounters. (R)
  14. I derive pleasure and enjoyment from sex.
  15. I’m constantly thinking about having sex.
  16. I think of myself as a very good sexual partner.
  17. I feel down about my sex life.
  18. I think about sex a great deal of the time.
  19. I would rate myself low as a sexual partner. (R)‌‌
  20. I feel unhappy about my sexual relationships.
  21. I seldom think about sex. (R)
  22. I am confident about myself as a sexual partner.
  23. I feel pleased with my sex life. (R)
  24. I hardly ever fantasize about having sex. (R)
  25. I am not very confident about my sexual skill. (R)
  26. I feel sad when I think about my sexual experiences.
  27. I probably think about sex less often than most people. (R)
  28. I sometimes doubt my sexual competence. (R)
  29. I am not discouraged about sex. (R)
  30. I don’t think about sex very often. (R)

Address correspondence to William E. Snell, Jr., Department of Psychology, Southeast Missouri State University, One University Plaza, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701; e-mail: [email protected]

References

Hurlbert, D. F., White, L. C., Powell, R. D., & Apt, C. (1993). Orgasm consistency training in the treatment of women reporting hypoactive sexual desire: An outcome comparison of women-only groups and couples-only groups. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 24, 3–13.

Snell, W. E., Jr., & Papini, D. R. (1989). The Sexuality Scale: An instru- ment to measure sexual-esteem, sexual-depression, and sexual-preoc- cupation. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 256–263.

Snell, W. E., Jr., Fisher, T. D., & Schuh, T. (1992). Reliability and validity of the Sexuality Scale: A measure of sexual-esteem, sexual-depression, and sexual-preoccupation. The Journal of Sex Research, 29, 261–273.

Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1993). The measurement of sexu- al-esteem: Investigation of Snell and Papini’s (1989) Sexuality Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 88–102.