Table of Contents
Description
This measure (Job Routinization and Formalization) was developed by Bacharach, Bamberger, and Conley (1990) to capture the elements often used in organizations to assert indirect control on workers. The preferences of employees are often in conflict with the needs of organizations to reduce uncertainty and variation in performance through routinization, formal documentation, establishment of rules, and re cord-keeping requirements for jobs. Collectively, these efforts to structure jobs may have positive effects by reducing employee ambiguity and negative effects by making jobs less appealing (Bacharach & Bamberger, 1995). The measure uses 12 items to describe the routinization, formalization, pervasiveness of rules, and record-keeping requirements of a job.
Reliability
Coefficient alpha values for routinization ranged from.71 to .83 (Bacharach & Bamberger, 1995; Bacharach et al., 1990). Coefficient alpha values were for formalization, .70 for pervasiveness of rules, and .72 for record keeping (Bacharach et , 1990).
Validity
Routinization was negatively correlated with role overload and challenge/ opportunities for growth. Pervasiveness of rules and record keeping were positively correlated with formal communication and formalization and negatively correlated with autonomy. Formalization was positively correlated with role conflict and the pervasiveness of rules for a job and negatively correlated with role overload and autonomy (Bacharach et al., 1990).
Source
Bacharach, S. B., Bamberger, P.R., &Conley, S. C. (1990). Work processes, role conflict, and role overload: The case of nurses and engineers in the pub lic sector. Work and Occupations, 17(2), 199-229. Copyright© 1990 by Sage Publications, Inc. Items were taken from portions of the appendix, pp. 223-224. Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc.
Items
Routinization items:
Responses to items 1 and 2 are obtained on a 4-point Likert-type scale where 1 = definitely true and 4 = definitely false.
- There is something different to do here every day
- For almost every job I do, there is something new happening almost every day
Responses to item 3 are obtained on a 4-point Likert-type scale where l= very non-routine and 4 = very routine.
- How routine would you say the work here is?
Pervasiveness of rules items:
Responses are obtained on a 4-point Likert-type scale where I = definitely false and 4 = definitely true.
- We have procedures here for every situation
- I have to follow strict operating procedures at all times
- I always check to see that I’m following the
Record-keeping items:
Responses are obtained on a 4-point Likert-type scale where 1 = definitely false and 4 = definitely true.
- In case of a crisis, I always refer to written records for accountability
- I keep accurate records of every situation
- I frequently use the records to check for information on an issue
Formalization items:
Responses are obtained on a 4-point Likert-type scale where I = definitely false and 4 = definitely true.
- There exists a document indicating the general procedure to follow
- There is a complete written description for my job
- There is a handbook or manual for my facility
- There is a chart showing the chain of command
- There are well-defined procedures specifying the proper channels of communication in most matters
- The organization keeps a written record of everyone’s job performance
This content is licensed under a CC-BY license. The CC-BY licenses grant rights of use the scales in your studies (the measurement instrument and its documentation), but do not replace copyright. This remains with the copyright holder, and you have to cite us as the source.
Mohammed Looti, PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES (2023) Job Routinization and Formalization scale. Retrieved from https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/job-routinization-and-formalization-scale/. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31575.96163