Table of Contents
Abstract
The CEO Decision Style and Firm Performance–Model (Kruse, Bendig, & Brettel, 2023) was developed to explore the relationships between firm performance and two key dimensions of CEO decision style: the use of heuristics and decision standards. This model conceptualizes the speed and innovativeness of new product development (NPD) as mediators in these relationships. The development involved adapting items from previous scales (e.g., Durinik et al., 2018; Misuraca et al., 2015; Sheng et al., 2013). The items were translated from English to German using back-translation (Brislin, 1970). These translated scales were then reviewed by three management consultants to ensure comprehensibility, and all items were refined based on feedback from a pre-test conducted with randomly selected firms. The resulting measure, comprising 23 items, was administered to German firms and evaluated using structural equation modeling and factor analysis. The study reported results concerning factor structure and reliability.
Keywords
Alternative Search, High Standards, New Product Development Speed, New Product Development Innovativeness, Firm Performance, CEO Decision Style, Creativity, Decision Making, Management Methods, Organizational Effectiveness, Product Design, Top Level Managers, Organizational and Occupational Measures.
Authors
Kruse, Sebastian; Bendig, David; Brettel, Malte
Purpose
The primary purpose of this measurement model is to assess CEOs’ decision styles in relation to NPD speed, NPD innovativeness, and overall firm performance.
Validity
No data is Available.
Reliability
Internal consistency was assessed, with Composite Reliability (CR) values ranging from 0.72 to 0.90 among the various constructs, indicating good internal consistency.
Factor Analysis
A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted, and the proposed five-factor model demonstrated good measures of fit for complex models in large samples (Hair et al., 2010): χ²[220] = 1171.809, p < 0.001, CFI: 0.92, RMSEA: 0.06, SRMR: 0.05. This structure significantly fit the data better than other models tested. All factor loadings were statistically significant at the 0.1 percent level, and all variables fulfilled the Fornell and Larcker (1981) criterion, indicating good convergent validity.
To assess common method variance (CMV), the comprehensive CFA marker technique (Williams et al., 2010) was employed. A marker variable from the survey was added to the baseline CFA model, and this model was compared to one in which all substantive items also loaded on the marker variable. The results indicated no statistical difference between the two models (Δχ² = 0.05, df = 1, p = 0.83), which strengthens confidence that CMV does not significantly influence the data.
Instrument: CEO Decision Style and Firm Performance–Model
Test Type
Original Instrument Type: Inventory/Questionnaire
Format
All items are measured using seven-point Likert scales. The measure includes 23 items.
Language Available
German
Population Group
Human; Male; Female
Age Group
No data is Available
Population Details
Respondents were Business Firm CEOs located in Germany.
Test Methodology
The instrument was evaluated using Test Reliability, Internal Consistency, Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Measurement Model, and Structural Equation Modeling.
Keywords
Alternative Search, High Standards, New Product Development Speed, New Product Development Innovativeness, Firm Performance, CEO Decision Style.
Authors
Kruse, Sebastian
Author ORCID Identifier: No data is Available
Affiliation: RWTH Aachen University, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Group (WIN) – TIME Research Area
Email Address: [email protected]
Correspondence Address: RWTH Aachen University, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Group (WIN) – TIME Research Area, Kackertstr. 7, Aachen, Germany, 52072, [email protected]
Bendig, David
Author ORCID Identifier: No data is Available
Affiliation: University of Münster, Institute for Entrepreneurship
Email Address: No data is Available
Brettel, Malte
Author ORCID Identifier: No data is Available
Affiliation: RWTH Aachen University
Email Address: No data is Available
Permissions & Fee and Test Year
Permissions: Contact Corresponding Author
Commercial: No
Fee: No
Test Year: 2023
References
Kruse, S., Bendig, D., & Brettel, M. (2023). How does CEO decision style influence firm performance? The mediating role of speed and innovativeness in new product development. Journal of Management Studies, 60(5), 1205–1235. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12913
Items of the CEO Decision Style and Firm Performance–Model
Factors and Subscales
The instrument includes the following factors: Alternative search, High standards, New product development speed, New product development innovativeness, and Performance.
Number of Items
This measure includes 23 items.
Test Items Available
No data is Available.
Cite this article
Mohammed looti (2026). CEO Decision Style and Firm Performance–Model Questionnaire. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Retrieved from https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/ceo-decision-style-and-firm-performance-model-questionnaire/
Mohammed looti. "CEO Decision Style and Firm Performance–Model Questionnaire." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 5 Apr. 2026, https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/ceo-decision-style-and-firm-performance-model-questionnaire/.
Mohammed looti. "CEO Decision Style and Firm Performance–Model Questionnaire." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 2026. https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/ceo-decision-style-and-firm-performance-model-questionnaire/.
Mohammed looti (2026) 'CEO Decision Style and Firm Performance–Model Questionnaire', PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Available at: https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/ceo-decision-style-and-firm-performance-model-questionnaire/.
[1] Mohammed looti, "CEO Decision Style and Firm Performance–Model Questionnaire," PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, vol. X, no. Y, ص Z-Z, April, 2026.
Mohammed looti. CEO Decision Style and Firm Performance–Model Questionnaire. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. 2026;vol(issue):pages.
