Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale

📜
Abstract

The Bergen social media addiction Scale (BSMAS) is a prominent psychological instrument designed to quantify problematic and compulsive engagement with social networking platforms. Originally adapted from a platform-specific measure (the Facebook Addiction Scale), this broader instrument addresses a critical conceptual shift in cyberpsychology: recognizing that users are typically addicted to the social networking activity itself rather than a single commercial platform. By capturing a generalized behavioral pattern, the scale allows researchers to assess digital addictions regardless of which specific application is currently trending.

This specific validation study focuses on adapting the BSMAS for the Italian population, ensuring its psychometric stability across a new cultural context. The adaptation process involved rigorous translation and structural testing to confirm that the core components of addiction translate accurately to Italian speakers. Furthermore, the instrument serves as a vital tool for exploring the intersection of digital behavior and interpersonal psychology, specifically how deep-seated relational patterns—such as attachment styles—might predispose individuals to compulsive online socialization.

For graduate students and researchers, the BSMAS represents a gold standard in Behavioral Addiction measurement. It moves beyond merely pathologizing high screen time, focusing instead on the functional impairment and psychological distress caused by excessive social media use. Its concise format and robust theoretical foundation make it highly suitable for large-scale epidemiological surveys and complex multivariate research designs.

📊 Psychometric Scorecard

Items Count
6
Structure
Unidimensional
Fit Index (CFI)
0.970
Validation Country
📍 Italy

Translation Method: Back-Translation

Authors

🏛 University of Foggia

🏛 Nottingham Trent University

🏛 University of Bari

Purpose

The primary utility of this scale lies in its ability to standardize the measurement of social media addiction across different cultural contexts. Prior to this validation, Italian researchers and clinicians lacked a psychometrically sound, localized tool to assess this modern Behavioral Addiction. By establishing a robust Italian version, the instrument bridges a significant methodological gap, enabling cross-cultural comparisons and facilitating localized clinical research.

Furthermore, the scale moves the field beyond platform-specific measures to capture general social networking behaviors. This is crucial in a rapidly evolving digital landscape where specific platforms rise and fall in popularity. The instrument provides a vital tool for investigating how underlying psychosocial vulnerabilities—such as insecure attachment styles—might drive individuals toward compulsive digital socialization, offering clinicians insights into the etiology of problematic internet use.

Construct

The BSMAS is theoretically anchored in the biopsychosocial model of addiction, which posits that behavioral addictions share core clinical features with substance use disorders. The construct encompasses six fundamental dimensions: salience (cognitive and behavioral preoccupation with social media), mood modification (using the behavior to cope or achieve an emotional shift), tolerance (needing increasing amounts of time online to achieve the same effect), withdrawal (distress when access is restricted), conflict (interpersonal or occupational impairment), and relapse (unsuccessful attempts to cut back).

In the context of this research, the construct of social media addiction is also examined through the lens of attachment theory. The theoretical framework suggests that an individual's internal working models of relationships influence their digital behaviors. For instance, individuals with anxious attachment styles may utilize social media compulsively to seek reassurance and monitor relationships, while those with avoidant styles might use it to maintain social distance. The scale effectively captures the behavioral manifestation of these underlying psychological needs.

Validity

To establish construct validity, the researchers employed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using a robust maximum likelihood estimation method. The analysis supported a unidimensional structure, indicating that all items load onto a single overarching latent trait of social media addiction. The model demonstrated strong fit to the data, evidenced by a Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of 0.97 and a Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) of 0.03, though the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) was slightly elevated at 0.094.

Crucially, the researchers also established Measurement invariance across both age and gender. By testing configural, metric, and strict invariance, they demonstrated that the scale functions equivalently for males, females, Adolescents, and young Adults. This is a vital psychometric property, as it ensures that any observed group differences in social media addiction scores reflect true variations in the underlying trait rather than measurement bias or differential item functioning.

Reliability

Rather than relying solely on traditional Cronbach's alpha, the psychometric evaluation utilized a more sophisticated suite of reliability indicators to ensure the scale's precision. The researchers examined the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) to verify that the items shared a sufficient proportion of variance with the underlying construct, with values exceeding the standard 0.50 threshold indicating adequate convergence.

Additionally, the study calculated the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) to quantify the precision of the observed scores and the expected fluctuation due to measurement error. Finally, the factor determinacy coefficient was evaluated to confirm that the estimated factor scores were highly correlated with the true latent trait. High determinacy values demonstrate that the scale provides a stable, precise, and reliable measurement of the addiction construct, making the observed scores suitable substitutes for the latent factor in clinical and research settings.

Factor Analysis

The structural evaluation of the instrument relied on confirmatory factor analysis, specifically utilizing the mean- and variance-adjusted maximum likelihood (MLMV) estimator. This specific analytical approach was chosen because it is highly robust to potential non-normality in the response distributions, a common issue in clinical and addiction screening tools where responses may be skewed. The analysis confirmed that a single-factor model adequately captures the variance among the items, aligning perfectly with the theoretical conceptualization of social media addiction as a cohesive, singular syndrome.

To ensure the scale's utility in comparative research, rigorous multigroup analyses were conducted. The establishment of configural, metric, and strict invariance across age groups confirms that the number of factors, the factor loadings, and the item intercepts remain consistent whether assessing a teenager or a young adult. This structural stability is essential for longitudinal studies tracking the developmental trajectory of social media addiction.

Instrument

Test Type Self-report questionnaire
Format 6 items
Scoring Total score calculated by summing the items
Language Italian
Population Adolescents, Adults, College students
Age Group 16-40 years
Administration Self-administered
Completion Time 15 minutes (for the entire survey battery)

Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale Items

📋 Items are currently not available

The individual items of this scale are not publicly available. Researchers interested in using this instrument should contact the original authors directly to request the scale materials.

Sample

The sample consisted of 734 Italian participants (415 males, 319 females) aged 16 to 40 years (mean age = 21.63, SD = 3.95). The sample was divided into Adolescents (aged 16-19, n = 270) and young Adults (aged over 20, n = 464). Participants were recruited via convenience sampling from Italian schools and universities.

📚
References
64 references
  1. American Psychiatric Association
    . (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
  2. Andreassen, C. S.
    (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports,2(2), 175–184. doi:10.1007/s40429-015-0056-910.1007/s40429-015-0056-9 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9
  3. Andreassen, C. S.
    ,

    Billieux, J.
    ,

    Griffiths, M. D.
    ,

    Kuss, D. J.
    ,

    Demetrovics, Z.
    ,

    Mazzoni, E.
    , &

    Pallesen, S.
    (2016). The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: A large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,30(2), 252–262. doi:10.1037/adb000016010.1037/adb0000160 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000160

  4. Andreassen, C. S.
    ,

    Griffiths, M. D.
    ,

    Gjertsen, S. R.
    ,

    Krossbakken, E.
    ,

    Kvam, S.
    , &

    Pallesen, S.
    (2013). The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Behavioral Addictions,2(2), 90–99. doi:10.1556/JBA.2.2013.00310.1556/JBA.2.2013.003 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.2.2013.003

  5. Andreassen, C. S.
    ,

    Pallesen, S.
    , &

    Griffiths, M. D.
    (2016). The relationship between excessive online social networking, narcissism, and self-esteem: Findings from a large national survey. Addictive Behaviors,64,287–293. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.00610.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006

  6. Andreassen, C. S.
    ,

    Torsheim, T.
    ,

    Brunborg, G. S.
    , &

    Pallesen, S.
    (2012). Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychological Reports,110,501–517. doi:10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-51710.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517 🔗 https://doi.org/10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517

  7. Barker, V.
    (2009). Older Adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: The influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior,12,209–213. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.022810.1089/cpb.2008.0228 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0228
  8. Bartholomew, K.
    (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social Personality Relationship,7,147–178.10.1177/0265407590072001 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590072001
  9. Bentler, P. M.
    , &

    Bonnett, D. G.
    (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin,88,588–606.10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

  10. Bentler, P. M.
    , &

    Dudgeon, P.
    (1996). Covariance structure analysis: Statistical practice, theory, and directions. Annual Review of Psychology,47,563–592.10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.563 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.563

  11. Billieux, J.
    ,

    Schimmenti, A.
    ,

    Khazaal, Y.
    ,

    Maurage, P.
    , &

    Heeren, A.
    (2015). Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for Behavioral Addiction research. Journal of Behavioral Addictions,4(3), 119–123. doi:10.1556/2006.4.2015.00910.1556/2006.4.2015.009 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.009

  12. Bollen, K. A.
    (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.10.1002/9781118619179 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179
  13. Bowlby, J.
    (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  14. Bowlby, J.
    (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  15. Bowlby, J.
    (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Sadness and depression. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  16. Brown, T. A.
    (2003). confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects?Behaviour Research and Therapy,41,1411–1426. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00059-710.1016/S0005-7967(03)00059-7 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00059-7
  17. Buffardi, E. L.
    , &

    Campbell, W. K.
    (2008). Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,34,1303–1314. doi:10.1177/014616720832006110.1177/0146167208320061 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208320061

  18. Chen, F. F.
    (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of Measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling,14,464–504. doi:10.1080/1070551070130183410.1080/10705510701301834 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  19. Cheung, G. W.
    , &

    Rensvold, R. B.
    (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing Measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling,9,233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_510.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

  20. Durkee, T.
    ,

    Kaess, M.
    ,

    Carli, V.
    ,

    Parzer, P.
    ,

    Wasserman, C.
    ,

    Floderus, B.
    ,

    Apter, A.
    ,

    Balazs, J.
    ,

    Barzilay, S.
    ,

    Bobes, J.
    ,

    Brunner, R.
    ,

    Corcoran, P.
    ,

    Cosman, D.
    ,

    Cotter, P.
    ,

    Despalins, R.
    ,

    Graber, N.
    ,

    Guillemin, F.
    ,

    Haring, C.
    ,

    Kahn, J. P.
    ,

    Mandelli, L.
    ,

    Marusic, D.
    ,

    Mészáros, G.
    ,

    Musa, G. J.
    ,

    Postuvan, V.
    ,

    Resch, F.
    ,

    Saiz, P. A.
    ,

    Sisask, M.
    ,

    Varnik, A.
    ,

    Sarchiapone, M.
    ,

    Hoven, C. W.
    , &

    Wasserman, D.
    (2012). Prevalence of pathological internet use among Adolescents in Europe: Demographic and social factors. Addiction,107(12), 2210–2222. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03946.x10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03946.x 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03946.x

  21. Elphinston, R. A.
    , &

    Noller, P.
    (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,14,631–635. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.031810.1089/cyber.2010.0318 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0318

  22. Fossati, A.
    ,

    Fenney, J. A.
    ,

    Donati, D.
    ,

    Domini, N.
    ,

    Novella, L.
    ,

    Bagnato, M.
    ,

    Acquarini, E.
    , &

    Maffei, C.
    (2003). On the dimensionality of the Attachment Style Questionnaire in Italian clinical and nonclinical participants. Journal of Social Personal Relationships,20(1), 50–79. doi:10.1177/0265407503020001187

  23. Griffiths, M. D.
    (2000). Internet addiction – Time to be taken seriously?Addiction Research,8(5), 413–418. doi:10.3109/1606635000900558710.3109/16066350009005587 🔗 https://doi.org/10.3109/16066350009005587
  24. Griffiths, M. D.
    (2005). A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use,10,191–197. doi:10.1080/1465989050011435910.1080/14659890500114359 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890500114359
  25. Griffiths, M. D.
    (2012). Facebook addiction: Concerns, criticisms and recommendations. Psychological Reports,110,518–520. doi:10.2466/01.07.18.PR0.110.2.518-52010.2466/01.07.18.PR0.110.2.518-520 🔗 https://doi.org/10.2466/01.07.18.PR0.110.2.518-520
  26. Griffiths, M. D.
    (2013). Social networking addiction: Emerging themes and issues. Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy,4,e118. doi:10.4172/2155-6105.1000e11810.4172/2155-6105.1000e118 🔗 https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000e118
  27. Hair, J. F.
    ,

    Black, W. C.
    ,

    Babin, B. J.
    , &

    Anderson, R. E.
    (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  28. Harkness, J.
    ,

    Pennell, B. E.
    , &

    Schoua-Glusberg, A.
    (2004). Survey questionnaire translation and assessment. In S.Presser, J. M.Rothgeb, M. P.Couper, J. T.Lessler, E.Martin, J.Martin, & E.Singer (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 453–473). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471654728.ch22 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1002/0471654728.ch22

  29. Hart, J.
    ,

    Nailling, E.
    ,

    Bizer, G. Y.
    , &

    Collins, C. K.
    (2015). attachment theory as a framework for explaining engagement with Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences,77,33–40. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.01610.1016/j.paid.2014.12.016 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.016

  30. Hazan, D.
    , &

    Shaver, P. R.
    (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52,511–524.10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511

  31. Hu, L.
    , &

    Bentler, P. M.
    (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,6,1–55. doi:10.1080/1070551990954011810.1080/10705519909540118 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

  32. Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A.
    ,

    Wright, S. L.
    , &

    Hudiburgh, L. M.
    (2012). The relationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook use. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,33,294–301. doi:10.1037/a003094610.1016/j.appdev.2012.08.001 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.08.001

  33. Karaiskos, D.
    ,

    Tzavellas, E.
    ,

    Balta, G.
    , &

    Paparrigopoulos, T.
    (2010). Social network addiction: A new clinical disorder?European Psychiatry,25,855. doi:10.1016/S0924-9338(10)70846-410.1016/S0924-9338(10)70846-4 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-9338(10)70846-4

  34. Kim, H. Y.
    (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics,38(1), 52–54. doi:10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.5210.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52 🔗 https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
  35. Kuss, D. J.
    , &

    Griffiths, M. D.
    (2011a). Excessive online social networking: Can Adolescents become addicted to Facebook?Education and Health,29(4), 68–71.

  36. Kuss, D. J.
    , &

    Griffiths, M. D.
    (2011b). Online social networking and addiction – A review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,8,3528–3552. doi:10.3390/ijerph809352810.3390/ijerph8093528 🔗 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8093528

  37. LaRose, R.
    ,

    Kim, J.
    , &

    Peng, W.
    (2010). Social networking: Addictive, compulsive, problematic, or just another media habit. In Z.Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 59–81). New York, NY: Routledge.

  38. Lin, J. H.
    (2015). The role of attachment style in Facebook use and social capital: Evidence from university students and a national sample. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,18(3), 173–180. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.034110.1089/cyber.2014.0341 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0341
  39. Lin, J. H.
    (2016). Need for relatedness: A self-determination approach to examining attachment styles, Facebook use, and psychological well-being. Asian Journal of Communication,26(2), 153–173. doi:10.1080/01292986.2015.112674910.1080/01292986.2015.1126749 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2015.1126749
  40. Mehdizadeh, S.
    (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,13,357–364. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.025710.1089/cyber.2009.0257 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0257
  41. Mikulincer, M.
    , &

    Shaver, P. R.
    (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  42. Monacis, L.
    ,

    de Palo, V.
    ,

    Griffiths, M. D.
    , &

    Sinatra, M.
    (2016). Validation of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale – Short-Form (IGDS9-SF) in an Italian-speaking people. Journal of Behavioral Addictions,5,683–690. doi:10.1556/2006.5.2016.08310.1556/2006.5.2016.083 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.083

  43. Monacis, L.
    ,

    de Palo, V.
    ,

    Griffiths, M. D.
    , &

    Sinatra, M.
    (2017). Exploring individual differences in online addictions: The role of identity and attachment. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11469-017-9768-510.1007/s11469-017-9768-5 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9768-5

  44. Morrow, J. R.
    ,

    Jackson, A. W.
    ,

    Disch, J. G.
    , &

    Mood, D. P.
    (2011). Measurement and evaluation in human performance (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

  45. Muthén, L. K.
    , &

    Muthén, B. O.
    (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  46. Oldmeadow, J. A.
    ,

    Quinn, S.
    , &

    Kowert, R.
    (2013). Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst Adults. Computers in Human Behavior,29,1142–1149. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.00610.1016/j.chb.2012.10.006 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.006

  47. Pelling, E. L.
    , &

    White, K. M.
    (2009). The theory of planned behavior applied to young people’s use of social networking web sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior,12,755–759. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.010910.1089/cpb.2009.0109 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0109

  48. Pempek, T. A.
    ,

    Yermolayeva, Y. A.
    , &

    Calvert, S. L.
    (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,30,227–238. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.01010.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010

  49. Phanasathit, M.
    ,

    Manwong, M.
    ,

    Hanprathet, N.
    ,

    Khumsri, J.
    , &

    Yingyeun, R.
    (2015). Validation of the Thai version of Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale (Thai-BFAS). Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand,98,108–117.

  50. Pontes, H. M.
    ,

    Andreassen, C. S.
    , &

    Griffiths, M. D.
    (2016). Portuguese validation of the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale: An empirical study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,14,1062–1073. doi:10.1007/s11469-016-969410.1007/s11469-016-9694-y 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-016-9694-y

  51. Pontes, H. M.
    , &

    Griffiths, M. D.
    (2015). Measuring DSM-5 Internet gaming disorder: Development and validation of a short psychometric scale. Computers in Human Behavior,45,137–143. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.00610.1016/j.chb.2014.12.006 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.006

  52. Pontes, H. M.
    , &

    Griffiths, M. D.
    (2016). Portuguese Validation of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale–Short-Form. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,19,288–293. doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.060510.1089/cyber.2015.0605 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0605

  53. Rom, E.
    , &

    Alfasi, Y.
    (2014). The role of adult attachment style in online social network affect, cognition, and behavior. Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy Research,1,24–34.

  54. Schimmenti, A.
    ,

    Passanisi, A.
    ,

    Gervasi, A. M.
    ,

    Manzella, S.
    , &

    Fama, F. I.
    (2014). Insecure attachment attitudes in the onset of problematic Internet use among late Adolescents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development,45(5), 588–595. doi:10.1007/s10578-013-0428-010.1007/s10578-013-0428-0 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-013-0428-0

  55. Sinatra, M.
    ,

    de Palo, V.
    ,

    Contini, P.
    , &

    Volpicella, V.
    (2016). Identity styles and internet-related addictive behaviours in Adolescents. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,15,1161–1165.

  56. Tabachnick, B. G.
    , &

    Fidell, L. S.
    (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  57. Vandenberg, R. J.
    , &

    Lance, C. E.
    (2000). A review and synthesis of the Measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods,3(1), 4–69. doi:10.1177/10944281003100210.1177/109442810031002 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002

  58. Wang, C. W.
    ,

    Ho, R. T.
    ,

    Chan, C. L.
    , &

    Tse, S.
    (2015). Exploring personality characteristics of Chinese Adolescents with internet-related addictive behaviors: Trait differences for gaming addiction and social networking addiction. Addictive Behaviors,42,32–35. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.03910.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.039 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.039

  59. Wegmann, E.
    ,

    Stodt, B.
    , &

    Brand, M.
    (2015). Addictive use of social networking sites can be explained by the interaction of Internet use expectancies, Internet literacy, and psychopathological symptoms. Journal of Behavioral Addictions,4(3), 155–162. doi:10.1556/2006.4.2015.02110.1556/2006.4.2015.021 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.021

  60. Wilson, K.
    ,

    Fornasier, S.
    , &

    White, K. M.
    (2010). Psychological predictors of young Adults’ use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,13,173–177. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.009410.1089/cyber.2009.0094 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0094

  61. Wu, A. M. S.
    ,

    Cheung, V. I.
    ,

    Ku, L.
    , &

    Hung, E. P. W.
    (2013). Psychological risk factors of addiction to social networking sites among Chinese smartphone users. Journal of Behavioral Addictions,2(3), 160–166. doi:10.1556/JBA.2.2013.00610.1556/JBA.2.2013.006 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.2.2013.006

  62. Wuang, Y. P.
    ,

    Su, C. Y.
    , &

    Huang, M. H.
    (2012). Psychometric comparisons of three measures for assessing motor functions in preschoolers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,56(6), 567–578. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01491.x10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01491.x 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01491.x

  63. Yaakobi, E.
    , &

    Goldenberg, J.
    (2014). Social relationships and information dissemination in virtual social network systems: An attachment theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior,38,127–135. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.02510.1016/j.chb.2014.05.025 🔗 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.025

  64. Young, K.
    (1999). Internet addiction: Symptoms, evaluation and treatment. In L.VandeCreek & T.Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book (Vol. 17, pp. 19–31). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

Cite this article

Mohammed looti (2026). Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Retrieved from https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/bergen-social-media-addiction-scale/

Mohammed looti. "Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 14 Aug. 2026, https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/bergen-social-media-addiction-scale/.

Mohammed looti. "Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 2026. https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/bergen-social-media-addiction-scale/.

Mohammed looti (2026) 'Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale', PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Available at: https://scales.arabpsychology.com/s/bergen-social-media-addiction-scale/.

[1] Mohammed looti, "Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale," PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, vol. X, no. Y, ص Z-Z, August, 2026.

Mohammed looti. Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. 2026;vol(issue):pages.

× Figure
PDF
Scroll to Top