How can I use Stata to conduct a one-way ANOVA power analysis?

How can I use Stata to conduct a one-way ANOVA power analysis?

Stata is a statistical software commonly used for data analysis and modeling. One of its powerful features is the ability to conduct a one-way ANOVA power analysis. This process allows researchers to determine the appropriate sample size for a study in order to achieve a desired level of statistical power. By using Stata’s built-in commands, users can input the necessary information such as effect size, significance level, and desired power, and the software will generate the sample size needed to detect the specified effect with the desired level of confidence. This allows researchers to plan their studies more effectively and ensure that their findings are reliable and meaningful.

One-way Anova Power Analysis | Stata Data Analysis Examples

Introduction

Power analysis is the name given to the process for determining the sample size for a
research study. The technical definition of power is that it is the probability of
detecting a “true” effect when it exists. Many students think that there is a simple
formula for determining sample size for every research situation. However, the reality
it that there are many research situations that are so complex that they almost defy
rational power analysis. In most cases, power analysis involves a number of
simplifying assumptions, in order to make the problem tractable, and running the
analyses numerous times with different variations to cover all of the contingencies.

In this unit we will try to illustrate the power analysis process using a simple
four group design.

Description of the Experiment

We wish to conduct a study in the area of mathematics education involving different
teaching methods to improve standardized math scores in local classrooms. The study
will include four different teaching methods and use fourth grade students who are
randomly sampled from a large urban school district and are then random assigned to
the four different teaching methods.

Here are the four different teaching methods which will be examined: 1) The
traditional teaching method where the classroom teacher explains the concepts
and assigns homework
problems from the textbook; 2) the intensive practice method, in which students fill out
additional work sheets both before and after school; 3) the computer assisted method, in
which students learn math concepts and skills from using various computer
based math learning programs; and, 4) the peer assistance learning method, which pairs
each fourth grader with a fifth grader who helps them learn the concepts followed by
the student teaching the same material to another student in their group.

Students will stay in their math learning groups for an entire academic year. At the end
of the Spring semester all students will take the Multiple Math Proficiency Inventory (MMPI).
This standardized test has a mean for fourth graders of 550 with a standard deviation of
80.

The experiment is designed so that each of the
four groups will have the same sample size.
One of the important questions we need to answer in designing the study is,
how many students will be needed in each group?

The Power Analysis

In order to answer this question, we will need to make some assumptions and
some educated guesses about the data.
First, we will assume that the standard deviation
for each of the four groups will be equal and will be equal to the national value of 80.
Further, we expect, because of prior research, that the traditional teaching group (Group 1)
will have the lowest mean score and that the peer assistance group (Group 4) will have the highest
mean score on the MMPI. In fact, we expect that Group 1 will have a mean of 550
and that Group 4 will have mean that is greater by 1.2 standard deviations, i.e., the mean
will equal at least 646. For the sake of simplicity, we will assume that the means of the
other two groups will be equal to the grand mean.

We will make use of the Stata program power to do the power
analysis. The power command needs the following information in order to do
the power analysis: 1) the keyword oneway 2)the number means of the groups, and 3) variance within each of the groups. The default alpha level is 0.05.

power oneway 550 598 598 646, varerror(6400 6400 6400 6400)

Performing iteration ...

Estimated sample size for one-way ANOVA
F test for group effect
H0: delta = 0  versus  Ha: delta != 0

  +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |   alpha   power       N N_per_group   delta     N_g      m1      m2      m3      m4   Var_m   Var_e |
  |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |     .05      .8      68          17   .4243       4     550     598     598     646    1152    6400 |
  |     .05      .8      68          17   .4243       4     550     598     598     646    1152    6400 |
  |     .05      .8      68          17   .4243       4     550     598     598     646    1152    6400 |
  |     .05      .8      68          17   .4243       4     550     598     598     646    1152    6400 |
  +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

The table above shows that we can achieve a power of 0.8 with 17 students
per group. While 17 students per group sound like a fine number of subjects if everything works
out as planned, we should consider what would occur if things do not work out
as planned. Let’s say that the treatment effect is not a large 1.2 but a more modest .75.

power oneway 550 580 580 610, varerror(6400 6400 6400 6400)
 
 Performing iteration ...

Estimated sample size for one-way ANOVA
F test for group effect
H0: delta = 0  versus  Ha: delta != 0

  +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |   alpha   power       N N_per_group   delta     N_g      m1      m2      m3      m4   Var_m   Var_e |
  |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |     .05      .8     160          40   .2652       4     550     580     580     610     450    6400 |
  |     .05      .8     160          40   .2652       4     550     580     580     610     450    6400 |
  |     .05      .8     160          40   .2652       4     550     580     580     610     450    6400 |
  |     .05      .8     160          40   .2652       4     550     580     580     610     450    6400 |
  +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Now, it looks like we will need 40 students per group to achieve a power of 0.8. The effect size of 0.75 is considered moderate. Finally,
just to be safe, we should see what sample size would be needed if the there was a small
effect size of, say, 0.25.

power oneway 550 560 560 570, varerror(6400 6400 6400 6400)

Performing iteration ...

Estimated sample size for one-way ANOVA
F test for group effect
H0: delta = 0  versus  Ha: delta != 0

  +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  |   alpha   power       N N_per_group   delta     N_g      m1      m2      m3      m4   Var_m   Var_e |
  |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |     .05      .8   1,400         350  .08839       4     550     560     560     570      50    6400 |
  |     .05      .8   1,400         350  .08839       4     550     560     560     570      50    6400 |
  |     .05      .8   1,400         350  .08839       4     550     560     560     570      50    6400 |
  |     .05      .8   1,400         350  .08839       4     550     560     560     570      50    6400 |
  +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

This output indicates that an N of about 350 per group is needed to obtain a power of 0.8 when the effect size is 0.25.

Here are the sample sizes per group that we have come up with in our power analysis:
17 (best case scenario), 40 (medium effect size),
and 350 (almost the worst case scenario). Even though we expect a large effect, we will shoot
for a sample size of between 40 and 50. For one thing, it is all that our research budget
will allow and the school district won’t allow us to use more than 200 students total.

See Also

Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Cite this article

stats writer (2024). How can I use Stata to conduct a one-way ANOVA power analysis?. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Retrieved from https://scales.arabpsychology.com/stats/how-can-i-use-stata-to-conduct-a-one-way-anova-power-analysis/

stats writer. "How can I use Stata to conduct a one-way ANOVA power analysis?." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 29 Jun. 2024, https://scales.arabpsychology.com/stats/how-can-i-use-stata-to-conduct-a-one-way-anova-power-analysis/.

stats writer. "How can I use Stata to conduct a one-way ANOVA power analysis?." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 2024. https://scales.arabpsychology.com/stats/how-can-i-use-stata-to-conduct-a-one-way-anova-power-analysis/.

stats writer (2024) 'How can I use Stata to conduct a one-way ANOVA power analysis?', PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Available at: https://scales.arabpsychology.com/stats/how-can-i-use-stata-to-conduct-a-one-way-anova-power-analysis/.

[1] stats writer, "How can I use Stata to conduct a one-way ANOVA power analysis?," PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, vol. X, no. Y, ص Z-Z, June, 2024.

stats writer. How can I use Stata to conduct a one-way ANOVA power analysis?. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. 2024;vol(issue):pages.

Download Post (.PDF)
Slide Up
x
PDF
Scroll to Top