the Stakeholder Knowledge Sharing–Measurement Model

Description

The Stakeholder Knowledge Sharing–Measurement Model (Chaudhuri et al., 2025) was developed to investigate how knowledge sharing among a firm’s stakeholders impacts its innovative performance. The instrument was designed for a study conducted with an Indian sample of respondents from different firms. The current constructs were evaluated in this sample using a total of 23 items adapted from previous sources (e.g., Zahra & George, 2002; James & Mondal, 2019). Factor analysis, reliability, and validity results were reported for these items.

Purpose

The primary goal of this measurement model is to enhance our understanding of the role that modern technology usage plays in firm innovation performance.

Validity

Convergent Validity: After estimating the average variance extracted (AVE) of all the constructs, it was found that all the values of AVEs were more than 0.5, which is the recommended lowest value of AVE (Hair et al., 2017).
Discriminant Validity: The square roots of all the AVEs were computed, and it appeared that they were greater than the respective bifactor correlation coefficients.

Reliability

Internal Consistency: Cronbach’s alphas ranged from .87 to .89.

Factor Analysis

Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The estimated values of the loading factors (LFs) of all the instruments were found to be >0.7, which is the recommended lowest value (Chin, 2010).

Test Methodology

The study employed several methodologies to assess the measure, including:

• Test Validity

• Convergent Validity

• Discriminant Validity

• Test Reliability

• Internal Consistency

• Factor Analysis

• Confirmatory Factor Analysis

• Measurement Model

Population Details

Respondents: Participants from Different Firms
Location: India

Age Group

Adulthood (18 yrs & older)

Population Group

Human; Male; Female

Test Type

Original

Instrument Type

Inventory/Questionnaire

Format

The responses are quantified using a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 representing Strongly Disagree (SD) and 5 representing Strongly Agree (SA). The midpoints are defined as: D (disagree), N (neither disagree nor agree), and A (agree).

Language Available

English

Keywords

Firm Innovation Performance; Knowledge Sharing Among Stakeholders; Process Innovation; Product Innovation; Measurement Model; Business Organizations; Knowledge Transfer; Organizational Innovation; Organizational Performance; Product Design; Stakeholder; Organizational and Occupational Measures; Measurement Models

Test Year

2025

Author

Chaudhuri, Ranjan; Chatterjee, Sheshadri; Vrontis, Demetris; Basile, Gianpaolo

Author ocrid Identifier

Chatterjee, Sheshadri: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1075-5549
Basile, Gianpaolo: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5383-5728

Affiliation

Chaudhuri, Ranjan: Department of Marketing, Indian Institute of Management
Chatterjee, Sheshadri: Indian Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science & Engineering
Vrontis, Demetris: Department of Management, University of Nicosia
Basile, Gianpaolo: Sapienza University

Email

Chatterjee, Sheshadri: [email protected]

files

No data is Available

Permissions

Contact Corresponding Author

Fee

No

Correspondence Address

Chatterjee, Sheshadri: Indian Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, West Bengal, Kharagpur, India, [email protected]

reference’s

Chaudhuri, R., Chatterjee, S., Vrontis, D., & Basile, G. (2025). Examining the role of knowledge sharing among stakeholders and firm innovation performance: Moderating role of technology usage. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 34(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12575

items of the Stakeholder Knowledge Sharing–Measurement Model

This is a 23-item measure. No data is Available