Table of Contents

Cowart–Pollack Scale of Sexual Experience
DEBRA COWART-STECKLER,1 University of Mary Washington
ROBERT H. POLLACK, University of Georgia
The Cowart–Pollack Scale of Sexual Experience consists of two checklists of heterosexual activities: one for men and another for women. It was developed to assess the sex- ual experience of an individual or group of individuals in research, therapy, or the classroom.
Description
The checklists comprise a wide range of sexual activities for men and women, including oral contacts, masturbation, various intercourse positions, anal intercourse, and bondage. The female scale consists of 30 sexual activities. They range from “your nude breast felt by male” to “anal intercourse.” The male scale consists of 31 sexual activities, ranging from “feeling female’s nude breast” to “bondage.”
Initially, the sexual experience scales consisted of 47 items drawn from previous studies (Bentler, 1968a, 1968b; Zuckerman, 1973). These 47-item scales were distributed to 153 men and 226 women during a group-testing session. After completion, the items were ordered from most to least frequent according to the percentages of subjects who reported that they had engaged in such behavior. In accordance with the Cornell technique of Guttman scaling with two response categories, the top and bottom 10% of the items were discarded. This procedure yielded the present scales.
Investigations of the range of heterosexual experiences have shown a predictable sequence of experiences for men and women (Cowart & Pollack, 1979; Cowart-Steckler, 1984). These experiences can be described using the Cornell technique of Guttman scaling in which the behaviors are ordered from most frequent to least frequent (Guttman, 1947). Guttman scaling assumes that an individual who experiences a less frequent behavior previously has experienced the more common behavior (Edwards, 1957). Applying the Guttman scaling technique to sexual experiences suggests that heterosexual relationships progress through similar sequences of experiences. An individual who responds to this scale, then, can be compared to the normative sample and the level of sexual experience can be ascertained.
The Cowart–Pollack scale has been standardized using a college-aged sample (aged 18 to 21) and, therefore, is appropriate for people in that age group. Distributing the questionnaire to people of different ages may yield a different ordering in the sequence of behaviors.
Response Mode and Timing
When the scale is used in research, therapy, or to assess one’s level of sexual experience, the items are ordered ran- domly. Respondents indicate that they have or have not experienced each behavior by circling yes or no in answer to the question “Have you experienced the following?” The scale usually requires an average of 10 minutes for completion.
Scoring
No scoring per se is required. A comparison between the ordering of the respondent’s experiences and the norms established by the Cowart–Pollack scale will give an accurate indication of the respondent’s level of sexual experience.
Reliability and Validity
The Cowart–Pollack scale has been distributed twice to large groups of college-aged individuals. In 1979 (Cowart & Pollack, 1979), the 31-item scale for men and the 30- item scale for women were administered in a group-testing situation to 199 men and 213 women. The coefficient of reproducibility for the male and female scales was .85 and .88, respectively. A coefficient of at least .85 indicates reliability in the ordering of behaviors (Edwards, 1957).
In 1983 the Cowart–Pollack scale was distributed to 197 men and 212 women (Cowart-Steckler, 1984). These sub- jects were demographically similar to the subjects in 1979. The coefficient of reproducibility was .88 for the male scale and .87 for the female scale.
The major difference in the results of the 1979 and 1983 distribution was not in the ordering of sexual experiences but in the numbers of men and women engaging in most types of sexual experiences. There were significantly more men and women from the 1983 sample engaging in sexual activities. This finding suggests that, at least for individuals aged 18 to 21, there has been an increase in sexual activity from 1979. As the coefficients of reproducibility indicate, the results of the 1983 distribution represent a reliable and stable sequence of events.
Address correspondence to Debra Cowart-Steckler, Department of Psychology, University of Mary Washington, Fredericksburg, VA 22401; e-mail: [email protected]
Cowart–Pollack Scale of Sexual Experience
Men (N = 197) |
Women (N = 212) |
||
Activity |
% Yesa |
Activity |
% Yes |
Feeling female’s nude breast |
98 |
Your nude breast felt by male |
91 |
Male mouth contact with female’s nude breast |
94 |
Male mouth contact with your breast |
91 |
Exposure to erotic materials sold openly in |
Penetration of vagina by male’s finger |
83 |
|
newsstands |
93 |
Male lying prone on female without penetration |
83 |
Male finger penetration of vagina |
92 |
Partner’s observation of your nude body |
80 |
Your observation of nude partner |
91 |
Clitoral manipulation by male |
79 |
Partner’s observation of your nude body |
91 |
Your observation of nude partner |
78 |
Clitoral manipulation by male |
90 |
Male manipulation of vulva |
77 |
Manipulation of penis by female |
90 |
Manipulation of penis by female |
76 |
Male lying prone on female without penetration |
87 |
Sexual intercourse, male superior |
67 |
Female mouth contact with penis |
86 |
Female mouth contact with penis |
67 |
Male manipulation of vulva |
84 |
Male mouth contact with vulva |
66 |
Sexual intercourse, male superior |
83 |
Male tongue manipulation of clitoris |
66 |
Masturbation |
81 |
Male tongue penetration of vagina |
66 |
Clitoral manipulation to orgasm by male |
78 |
Sexual intercourse, face to face, side |
60 |
Male mouth contact with vulva |
77 |
Showering or bathing with partner |
58 |
Sexual intercourse, partially clothed |
77 |
Exposure to erotic materials sold openly in |
|
Male tongue penetration of vagina |
76 |
newsstand |
58 |
Male tongue manipulation of clitoris |
75 |
Sexual intercourse, partially clothed |
56 |
Mutual oral stimulation of genitals to orgasm |
74 |
Clitoral manipulation to orgasm by male |
55 |
Sexual intercourse, face to face, side |
73 |
Sexual intercourse, female superior |
55 |
Exposure to hardcore erotic materials |
72 |
Masturbation |
54 |
Sexual intercourse, female superior |
71 |
Sexual intercourse, vagina entered from rear |
46 |
Showering or bathing with partner |
68 |
Mutual oral stimulation of genitals to orgasm |
45 |
Male tongue manipulation of female genitals to orgasm |
66 |
Male tongue manipulation of your genitals to orgasm |
45 |
Sexual intercourse, vagina entered from rear |
63 |
Hand contact with partner’s anal area |
40 |
61 |
Sexual intercourse, sitting position |
37 |
|
Sexual intercourse, standing |
48 |
Sexual intercourse, standing |
28 |
Sexual intercourse, sitting |
48 |
Exposure to hardcore erotic materials |
24 |
Finger penetration of partner’s anus |
39 |
Finger penetration of partner’s anus |
19 |
Use of mild pain |
16 |
Anal intercourse |
13 |
From Cowart-Steckler (1984). |
References
Bentler, P. M. (1968a). Heterosexual behavior assessment-I. Males. Behavior Research and Therapy, 6, 21–25.
Bentler, P. M. (1968b). Heterosexual behavior assessment-II. Females. Behavior Research and Therapy, 6, 27–29.
Cowart, D. A., & Pollack, R. H. (1979). A Guttman scale of sexual experience. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy, 1, 3–6.
Cowart-Steckler, D. (1984). A Guttman scale of sexual experience: An update. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy, 10, 49–52.
Edwards, A. L. (1957). Techniques of attitude scale construction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Guttman, L. (1947). The Cornell technique of scale and intensity analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 7, 247–280.
Zuckerman, M. (1973). Scales for sexual experience for males and females. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 11, 27–29.