Table of Contents
Accuracy in parameter estimation is a crucial aspect of Stata data analysis as it directly impacts the reliability and validity of the results obtained. Parameter estimation involves using statistical techniques to estimate the values of unknown parameters in a given dataset. These estimated parameters are then used to make inferences and draw conclusions about the population from which the data is collected. Therefore, the accuracy of these estimated parameters is essential in ensuring the validity of the conclusions drawn. Inaccurate parameter estimation can lead to incorrect conclusions and potentially misguide decision-making processes. Hence, it is imperative to strive for accuracy in parameter estimation to ensure the credibility and usefulness of Stata data analysis results.
Accuracy in Parameter Estimation | Stata Data Analysis Examples
Introduction
Not all sample size issues are directly related to power. Accuracy in parameter estimation (AIPE)
is also a function of sample size, that is, the larger the sample size the smaller the
confidence interval for a parameter estimate. Accuracy in parameter estimation allows you to specify
the size of confidence interval you want to achieve and, in return, gives you the sample size needed
to achieve that confidence interval. As Kelly and Maxwell (2003) state, “The AIPE approach yields
precise estimates of population parameters by providing necessary sample sizes in
order for the likely widths of confidence intervals to be sufficiently narrow.”
In this unit we will illustrate how to do an AIPE analysis for a multiple
regression model that has two control variables, one categorical research variable
and one continuous research variable, with the focus being on the confidence interval
for the continuous research variable.
Description of the Experiment
We will be using the same data analysis example that was used in the unit on
multiple regression power analysis. In that analysis,
a school district is designing a multiple regression study looking at the effect of
gender, family income, mother’s education and language spoken in the home
(3 levels, 2 dummy variables) on the English
language proficiency scores of Latino high school students. Mother’s education
is the primary research variable that measures the number of years that the mother attended
school. It is a continuous variable ranging from 4 to 18 years.
When we ran the power analysis for testing the parameter for mother’s education, we came up with
sample sizes of 108, 138 and 182 for power values of .7, .8 and .9 respectively. We can check these
values against the sample size needed to achieve a researcher specified confidence interval.
AIPE
To conduct an AIPE analysis we will use the Stata program aipe (search aipe)
(see How can I use the search command to search for
programs and get additional help? for more information about using search). This
program was written by UCLA Academic Technology Services as an implementation of the
approach outlined in the Kelley and Maxwell (2003) article.
In this analysis we want to determine how large a sample will be needed to have a confidence
interval on the regression coefficient that extends 0.1 above and below the point
estimate. A confidence interval can be calculated as
- estimate ± margin of error.
The margin
of error, then, is the half-width width of the confidence interval which in the aipe
program is specified using the w option. To use aipe we also need to include
r2, the R2 for the full model, r2xx, the R2 for the
variable of interest with the other predictor variables, and p the number of
variables in the full model.
For this analysis, we believe, based on previous research, that
the R2 for the full model will be about 0.48 and that the R2 for
mother’s education with the other predictors will be about 0.4. The total number of predictors
in the model is 5 and we want a confidence interval half-width of 0.1 with an alpha
level of 0.05.
aipe, r2(.48) r2xx(.4) w(.1) p(5) alpha(.05) Accuracy in Parameter Estimation p = 5 -- number of predictor variables in full model alpha = .05 -- alpha level for confidence interval w = .1 -- confidence interval half-width R2 = .48 -- R-squared for full model R2xx = .4 -- R-squared for target predictor with other predictors quan = .8 -- quantile of chi-square distribution AIPE sample size N = 339 -- n needed for CI half-width of w = .1, 50% of time Nm = 366 -- n needed for CI half-width of w = .1, 100*(quan)% = 100*(.8)% = 80% of time
A confidence interval with a half-width of 0.1 will require either 339
or 366 students, depending on the percent of time that the half-width is likely to occur.
These sample sizes are considerably larger than
those from the power analysis for mother’s education.
Let’s see what making the confidence interval wider does for the sample size. We will rerun
the analysis using a half-width of 0.15.
aipe, r2(.48) r2xx(.4) w(.15) p(5) alpha(.05) Accuracy in Parameter Estimation p = 5 -- number of predictor variables in full model alpha = .05 -- alpha level for confidence interval w = .15 -- confidence interval half-width R2 = .48 -- R-squared for full model R2xx = .4 -- R-squared for target predictor with other predictors quan = .8 -- quantile of chi-square distribution AIPE sample size N = 154 -- n needed for CI half-width of w = .15, 50% of time Nm = 174 -- n needed for CI half-width of w = .15, 100*(quan)% = 100*(.8)% = 80% of time
The required sample sizes are much smaller for a half-width of 0.15 than for 0.1.
Based on the accuracy in parameter estimation analyses and taking into
consideration that
the researchers want a very narrow confidence interval half-width of 0.1, we will go with
a planned sample size of 340 students. A larger sample size would make the
specified
confidence interval more likely, but having a half-width of 0.1 50% of the time was
considered sufficient by the researchers involved in the study.
See Also
-
Multiple Regression Power analysis
-
Kelley, K. and Maxwell, S.E. 2003. Sample Size for Multiple Regression: Obtaining Regression
Coefficients That Are Accurate, Not Simply Significant.
Psychological Methods, 8(3), 305-321.
Cite this article
stats writer (2024). What is the importance of accuracy in parameter estimation in Stata data analysis?. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Retrieved from https://scales.arabpsychology.com/stats/what-is-the-importance-of-accuracy-in-parameter-estimation-in-stata-data-analysis/
stats writer. "What is the importance of accuracy in parameter estimation in Stata data analysis?." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 29 Jun. 2024, https://scales.arabpsychology.com/stats/what-is-the-importance-of-accuracy-in-parameter-estimation-in-stata-data-analysis/.
stats writer. "What is the importance of accuracy in parameter estimation in Stata data analysis?." PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, 2024. https://scales.arabpsychology.com/stats/what-is-the-importance-of-accuracy-in-parameter-estimation-in-stata-data-analysis/.
stats writer (2024) 'What is the importance of accuracy in parameter estimation in Stata data analysis?', PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. Available at: https://scales.arabpsychology.com/stats/what-is-the-importance-of-accuracy-in-parameter-estimation-in-stata-data-analysis/.
[1] stats writer, "What is the importance of accuracy in parameter estimation in Stata data analysis?," PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES, vol. X, no. Y, ص Z-Z, June, 2024.
stats writer. What is the importance of accuracy in parameter estimation in Stata data analysis?. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCALES. 2024;vol(issue):pages.
