Academic Setting Evaluation Questionnaire (ASEQ)

The material conditions in which I carry out my work are satisfactory.

Economically it is made possible for me to carry out my research.

I am given institutional help to publish my studies.

I consider my university teaching activities to be fairly paid.

I feel supported by my colleagues in the activities I carry out as a faculty member.

The academic context encourages my professional work.

There is satisfactory academic communication among the members of my department.

My human relationship with my departmental colleagues favours my academic/professional activity.

Teacher selection systems are suitable.

Teaching activity control systems are appropriate.

There are clear criteria for evaluating research activities.

There is agreement between my expectations of what a faculty member should be and what s/he in fact is.

Society appreciates the work done by university faculty.

University institutions stimulate me to improve as a university faculty member.

Teacher promotion systems are appropriate.

I have been prepared institutionally to carry out my duties as a researcher suitably.

The prospects for my work as a faculty member are favorable.

Future prospects as a university researcher are favorable.

I find adequate institutional aid to solve my professional problems as a faculty member.

I have sufficient time to carry out my research duties.

Students show interest in the subject that I teach.

University institutions encourage my research activity.

The civil service system is appropriate for carryout faculty’s teaching and research functions.

Students ask about their doubts in the time set aside to receive them.

Students’ opinions are taken into account with the aim of improving my teaching.

The faculty of the department cooperate in the preparation/execution of the department’s research programs.

Each year I take students’ opinions into account when working out my teaching methodology.

I adapt my teaching to the particular characteristics/demands of each group of students.

Students’ work adapts easily to the demands of my subject.

Labor contracts would enable faculty duties to be carried out better.

Some “objective” system of evaluation of teach faculty member’s research work is necessary.

Students show differential evaluation of each faculty member according to his/her teaching quality.

I feel supported by my departmental colleagues in my research.