Anti-China Rhetoric Instrument – ACRI

In the U.S., Chinese immigration is considered to have a greater impact on culture.

Compared to the U.S. education system, the Chinese education system is fundamentally less capable of producing students with critical thinking.

The overall quality of the Chinese education system at the higher education level can never reach the status enjoyed by its U.S. counterpart on the global stage.

In comparison to the U.S., China lags substantially behind in terms of its commitment to advocating civic engagement.

When it comes to addressing issues surrounding freedom of expression, the Chinese model of governance is incomparably inferior to its U.S. counterpart.

Contrasted with the U.S., China takes a much less acceptable approach to managing the global flow of information.

Considering how the code of academic conduct is upheld in the U.S. society, the Chinese society exhibits a much lower level of resistance against academic dishonesty.

Compared to the U.S. scientific culture, the Chinese scientific culture is much less informed by the principles of scientific integrity (i.e., the professional standards essential for the responsible practice of research).

As opposed to the U.S., China epitomized a self-centered society where much less emphasis is placed on promoting values of unselfishness.

Compared to foreign nationals in the U.S., foreigners in China are way more likely to become the target of xenophobic sentiments.

In terms of upward social mobility for ordinary people, China offers significantly fewer equal opportunities than the U.S.

China’s economic development was equipped with far fewer desirable features than its U.S. counterpart.